The House of Representatives voted Thursday to approve short-term funding for the Department of Homeland Security, ending weeks of uncertainty over the agency’s budget amid congressional disputes over immigration policy.

The measure, which passed by a vote of 257-167, provides funding for DHS agencies including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Coast Guard, the Transportation Security Administration and the Secret Service through Sept. 30. President Joe Biden signed the legislation Thursday evening.

The funding resolution came after prolonged negotiations between House Republicans and Democrats over immigration enforcement policies and border security measures. The delay created operational challenges for several DHS components, though the department continued operating under existing authorities.

“We’re pleased to have certainty in our funding so we can continue our critical missions protecting the American people,” said DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in a statement Thursday. “This funding will allow us to maintain essential operations across all our components.”

The budget uncertainty affected workforce planning across DHS agencies. TSA Administrator David Pekoske told Congress last month that prolonged funding delays create retention challenges, particularly for screening personnel at airports nationwide. The agency, which employs approximately 50,000 transportation security officers, has faced ongoing staffing pressures at major airports.

“Extended continuing resolutions make it difficult to plan for workforce needs and equipment upgrades,” Pekoske testified before the House Homeland Security Committee in March. “Predictable funding is essential for maintaining security operations.”

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also faced planning constraints during the funding uncertainty. CISA Director Jen Easterly has previously warned that budget delays hamper the agency’s ability to recruit cybersecurity professionals in a competitive market.

The funding dispute centered on Republican demands for enhanced border security measures and Democratic concerns about immigration enforcement policies. House Republicans initially pushed for provisions that would have expanded detention capacity and modified asylum processing procedures.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., defended the prolonged negotiations. “We have an obligation to secure our borders and ensure DHS has the resources and authorities needed to enforce our immigration laws,” Johnson said at a press conference Tuesday. “This funding package addresses those priorities while maintaining essential homeland security operations.”

Democrats criticized the delay in reaching an agreement. “This uncertainty was unnecessary and counterproductive,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee. “DHS components need stable, predictable funding to carry out their missions effectively.”

The Coast Guard faced particular operational impacts during the funding uncertainty. Vice Commandant Admiral Steven Poulin told maritime industry officials in March that delayed funding could affect vessel inspections and licensing processes, potentially creating backlogs for commercial shipping operations.

“Predictable appropriations allow us to maintain consistent inspection schedules and licensing operations that support maritime commerce,” Poulin said during a Maritime Transportation System National Advisory Committee meeting.

The legislation includes provisions for border security technology and maintains current staffing levels for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. However, it does not include some of the expanded detention authorities sought by House Republicans.

Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash., urged swift passage of the measure. “This funding will ensure DHS can continue protecting our communities while we work toward a comprehensive approach to immigration reform,” Murray said in a statement.

The budget resolution also addresses concerns raised by federal employee unions about the impact of prolonged funding uncertainty. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents many DHS workers, had warned that continued delays could affect recruitment and retention across the department.

“Federal employees need certainty about their agencies’ funding to effectively serve the public,” said AFGE National President Everett Kelley. “This resolution provides that stability while Congress continues working on longer-term budget priorities.”

Transportation industry groups expressed relief at the funding resolution. Airlines for America, the industry trade association, had raised concerns about potential impacts on airport security operations during the prolonged budget negotiations.

The short-term nature of the funding means Congress will need to address DHS appropriations again in the coming months. House Republicans indicated they plan to pursue comprehensive immigration legislation that would include border security funding and enforcement provisions.

“This is a temporary solution,” said Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. “We need comprehensive reform that gives DHS the tools and resources necessary to secure our borders and enforce immigration law.”

The funding uncertainty highlighted ongoing political divisions over immigration policy and border security priorities. Both parties acknowledged the need for sustained investment in homeland security capabilities while disagreeing on specific policy approaches.

Looking ahead, DHS officials emphasized their focus on maintaining operational readiness across all mission areas. The department oversees functions ranging from aviation security and cybersecurity to disaster response and immigration enforcement, requiring coordination across multiple agencies and stakeholders.